Asana Markdown

Posted on by admin

Converts selected tasks in Asana to a list of Markdown links and copies them onto the clipboard - asana-tasks-to-markdown.user.js.

Contribute to Asana/markdown-formatter development by creating an account on GitHub. Copy Asana Task with Markdown Link. A stupid boring chrome extension replace your clipboard data when you copying a asana task(s). Taskname 👉 - taskname(taskurl) support multiple lines copy. Build/CopyAsanaTicket.crx; Install. Open chrome's setting page. 👉 chrome://extensions/ go to extensions tab; check the. This is happening because Markdown editor is set to ON in the field Please describe this issue. I have cloned your form and set the Markdown editor to OFF for that field. After that, the task that is created in Asana does not have the text jotformuntitledmarkdown prepended. So, just set the Markdown editor to OFF to fix this. Asana is a project and task management platform that enables you to have better team communication and collaboration. With Asana you can create projects and tasks, your employees can be added to tasks and projects, share projects, or be includes in the comments, making sure that everyone on your team is in the loop.

When you started your hunt for a new project management software, you most likely considered several tools. And now, you’re weighing in the pros and cons of Asana vs Trello.

As someone who has used both the tools extensively for several periods, I’m going to go in-depth to help you decide which tool you should pick for your team.

Let’s jump in.

Asana vs Trello

Asana takes a task-oriented approach to project management where the main unit of work is a task. Trello is a project management software where everything is a card. It mimics a real-life Kanban Board that you’d have with sticky notes on different columns.

Trello is simple and easy to use. But you’re likely to feel like you’ve hit a wall as your team expands. Asana on the other hand is relatively harder to get started but has more capabilities than Trello.

Before we jump into the details, let’s take a quick overview of Asana and Trello.

Quick Overview of Trello

Trello was founded in 2011 and launched in Techcrunch Disrupt. Founded by Joel Spolsky and Michael Pryor, Trello quickly became popular among many teams and individuals alike.

In 2017, Atlassian, the maker of JIRA, acquired Trello. After all, a lot of development teams would often compare Trello vs JIRA, begin using Trello, but naturally switch to JIRA when they need more functionalities. However, this is changing. With tools like Zepel having a perfect balance between Trello and JIRA, more teams are less inclined to use JIRA.

When it was founded, Trello was possibly the only tool that took a radically different approach to project management. Instead of focussing on projects, Trello decided to focus more on the workflow of the task. This meant, Trello had only three things — Boards, Lists (or Columns), and Cards.

Since Trello mimics an actual Kanban Board, it gives teams the flexibility to consider each board as a project by itself. Columns represent the statuses through which each card would flow through. And the actual discussions and collaboration happen inside the card.

In plain words, if you or your team used a Kanban Board with sticky notes at your office (when people used to go to offices), then using Trello will be super easy for you.

The visual approach to project management by Trello enables you and your team to quickly see “who is doing what”.

By organizing your Trello board by different statuses of progress, you can move each card from one column to another as progress is made on that specific task.

For example, if you’re using Trello for web development, you might name each column as “Todo”, “Prioritized”, “In Progress”, “Reviewed”, and “Done”. You’d add each task under the “Todo” column and as you make progress on each task, you’d move it from one status to another till it’s moved to “Done”.

Of course, you can choose to edit the names of the columns to meet your team’s needs.

When you want to have discussions, set due dates, assign a card to a teammate, add labels, upload attachments, and descriptions, you can open up each card to add them.

Quick Overview of Asana

Asana was started by former Facebook founder Dustin Moskovitz and early Facebook employee Justin Rosenstein in 2008. It was kept in private beta for almost four years before they launched commercially for the public in April 2012.

Asana is centred around projects. Within each project you create, you can create sections to categorize tasks. Each task can have subtasks, descriptions, assignees, tags, comments, and custom fields.

However, if you want to view a nestled view of all the tasks and subtasks, that is not possible.

After you’ve selected/created a project, you can create tasks by clicking on the plus button from the top. To add other details to the task, clicking on the specific task will open its details panel from the right of your screen. This detailed view of the task will also have a timeline of all the activities of the tasks.

You can choose to view these tasks either in List, Board, Timeline, or Calendar view. All comments and other notifications related to the project are collected in a separate tab inside Asana called the “Inbox”.

Views and other features

Trello primarily being a kanban software, doesn’t come with any other views built-in. All you’ve got is a kanban board view and that’s it. If you want other views such as Gantt or calendar, you can choose to use one of their 3rd-party “power-ups”. However, there are no power-ups to view everything in one single list. And you might end up paying a lot for it (more on this later).

Asana, on the other hand, has several views baked-in to the product. It comes with views such as List, Board, Calendar, and Timeline (Gantt). But their pricing plans restrict you to List, Board, and Calendar views on the free plan.

Of course, other features such as assignees, due dates, comments, tags, file attachments, and integrations are available on both Asana and Trello. You should note that only Trello allows you to add multiple assignees for a task similar to Zepel.

Verdict: Purely based on the number of features and views available, Asana is a clear winner compared to Trello.

Pricing

First things first. I’m sure you’re already aware of this, but I thought I should mention it anyway. You shouldn’t have to choose project management primarily based on pricing and sacrifice your team’s productivity.

If you’re getting more capabilities out of a tool and your team requires those capabilities to perform at their best, then a few $$ shouldn’t come in their way. But of course, if the capabilities of a free project management software are good enough for your team for now, then great!

With that out of the way, let’s compare the pricing of Trello vs Asana.

Trello Pricing

Much like many project management tools, Trello also follows a freemium pricing model. They provide you with a certain set of basic features for free. But when you need more capabilities and power, you’ll have to start paying them.

Trello’s pricing starts at $0 with a limited set of features and works its way up to $9.99 per member per month (when paid annually) or $12.50 per member per month (when paid monthly). Trello’s enterprise plan starts at $17.50 per member per month.

A point to note about Trello’s free plan is it’s free for unlimited users. They begin per user to charge only when you need more features.

As you start using Trello more frequently, you’re likely to want to use their premium features and end up paying for it. Some features you might want to pay for include higher limits on file attachments, custom fields, and more number of power-ups.

For example, on the free plan, you can use only one power-up per board. This can become tricky if you want to add more views like Calendar or Gantt using Trello’s power-ups. Not only will pay extra for Trello to use more power-ups, but you might also have pay to the 3rd parties who built the power-ups.

Asana Pricing

Asana’s pricing plans also follow a freemium model.

Asana’s pricing starts at $0 for a limited set of features for 15 members. Its premium plan costs $10.99 per member per month (when paid annually) or $13.49 per member per month (when paid monthly). Business plan costs $24.99 per member per month (when paid annually) or $30.49 per member per month (when paid monthly). If you want an enterprise plan, you’ll have to contact their sales team.

At first sight, it looks like Asana charges about a dollar more than Trello. However, you should also keep in mind that Asana’s free plan does come with more features compared to Trello.

Verdict: Draw. Considering the number of features and capabilities that comes from the two tools for at a price that’s nearly the same, it’s hard to pick one over the other.

NOTE: Keep in mind that while Asana is free to use for 15 members when you add your 16th member, you’ll be charged for all 16 members on the premium plan. Trello’s pricing is also similar.

Zepel, on the other hand, is free forever for the first 5 members. When you add your 6th member, you’ll be charged only for the 6th member and not for the first five.

Collaboration

Collaboration in both Trello and Asana are pretty straightforward. Both tools have the usual collaboration-focussed features like descriptions, assignees, due dates, tags, comments, and file attachments.

Trello allows you to collaborate with an unlimited number of users even if you’re on the free plan. This, of course, is a huge bonus for small teams who might not need a lot of features.

Asana limits you to 15 members on the free plan even if you don’t want to use their premium features. Unlike Trello which allows you to upload up to 250MB per file (at least if you upgrade), Asana only allows a maximum limit of 100MB per file even on a higher paid plan.

Verdict: Trello is a clear winner over Asana thanks to them allowing an unlimited number of collaborators even on the free plan.

Dependencies

Among all collaboration specific features, dependencies have to be one of the most important ones in a project management tool.

Trello, unfortunately, doesn’t have capabilities that allow you to mark dependencies between cards. This is where Asana beats Trello.

Asana lets you add dependencies between tasks and view them on a timeline (Gantt). This timeline view is especially useful when you want to manage conflicts between dependencies.

However, you must keep in mind that unlike Zepel, dependencies in Asana is not available in the free plan. Asana users can use dependencies only if they subscribe to a premium or higher paid plans.

Verdict: Comparing Asana vs Trello, the clear winner when it comes to managing dependencies is Asana.

User experience and ease of use

Both Trello and Asana have invested a great deal into building software that’s easy to use and has a great user experience.

Trello, as you might already know, is known for its ease of use. If you had to gather your entire team in one room and explain to them how Trello works, it wouldn’t take you more than 10minutes. This makes it an obvious choice for many teams to select Trello since it removes the burden of onboarding your entire team and getting them to use it.

Unlike Trello, you might not be able to explain all of Asana and get your team on board in a few minutes. Of course, you could argue that it’s also partly because Asana has more functional capabilities.

To make things easier, Asana uses a left nav-bar for navigation and has specific tabs inside the project for different views. Asana also has Sections to help you categorize tasks under specific buckets.

Both Trello and Asana have detailed documentation and a helpful community if you ever feel stuck.

Verdict: Trello, if you want to get started immediately. Asana, if you need more power and okay with taking some time to onboard your team.

Integrations


3rd party integration in both Asana and Trello is pretty solid. Both tools have a huge list of tools (100+) they integrate with. They’ve got Slack, InVision, Dropbox, Salesforce, Hubspot, and many more!

If you can’t find a tool you’re using in their list, then you might be able to use Zapier to get the integration working.

If you’re a development team using either of the tools, then you might want to note that while both Trello and Asana have integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, neither of them are as deeply integrated as some of the other tools like Zepel.

Verdict: Draw.

Pros and Cons of Trello

Pros of using Trello

  1. Effortless to get started.
  2. Easy to get team onboard.
  3. Supports several use cases. From blog calendar to software development.
  4. Free to use for unlimited users.
  5. Helps you quickly see what’s happening.
  6. Advanced filters help you find what you want.
  7. No credit card required to get started.

Cons with Trello

  1. Doesn’t have import functionality if you’re coming from other tools.
  2. You can’t export your data if you’re on the free plan. This locks teams inside Trello.
  3. Can become extremely hard to manage software projects. This is where teams begin to look for Trello alternatives.
  4. Its flexibility can get misused and make the Trello board a mess to manage.
  5. No list view.
  6. Lacks / commands to get work done quickly.
  7. Has half-baked agile capabilities. While you can use Trello for scrum, it cannot be used as a full-fledged scrum tool as it lacks user stories, estimation points, and agile reports.
  8. Lacks several capabilities necessary for using Trello for web development or software development.

Pros and Cons of Asana

Pros of using Asana

  1. Custom tags.
  2. Reasonably easy to use interface.
  3. Several views to visualize projects.
  4. Many integrations.
  5. Ability to view tasks assigned to you.
  6. Several quick filters.
  7. Saved templates.

Cons with Asana

  1. No ability to add multiple assignees.
  2. Can get expensive pretty quickly.
  3. Free plan restricted to just 15 members.
  4. Steep learning curve
  5. Impossible to view tasks and subtasks in one single view.
  6. Doesn’t have / commands to get work done quickly.
  7. Does not have capabilities of a full-fledged agile tool.

Which is better? Trello or Asana?

AsanaTrello
PricingFree up to 15 users with feature
restrictions. Standard plan starts
at $13.49/month/user on monthly
plan.
Free for unlimited users with
feature restrictions. Standard
plan starts at $12.50/user/month
on monthly plan.
Agile FeaturesKanban Boards. Does not have agile
reports or Scrum capabilities.
Kanban Boards. Has some agile
capabilities as a 3rd-party
add-on. Lacks Scrum
capabilities.
Top FeaturesKanban Boards, Calendar, Gantt view,
Access Controls, and Project
Portfolio.
Kanban Boards and Power ups.
Typical CustomerNon-technical teams. Ideally,
marketers, sales folks, and
customer success teams.
Freelancers and small businesses.
Can support the needs of small
engineering teams as well.
IntegrationsMassive library of integrations
that meets use cases of CRM, design
review, and more.
Plenty of native integrations
including Zendesk, Slack, and
Salesforce.

As you can see, comparing Asana vs Trello both are equally good. Tool ideal for your team depends largely on your use case.

If you’re a small engineering team, Trello might be better for you. If you’re a non-technical team (marketing, sales, customer success), then Asana might be a better option.

If you’re a larger engineering team, neither Trello nor Asana might be right for you. You might want to compare and consider some of the popular Trello alternatives. And if you’re a large non-technical team, Asana might work fine for you. However, if you’re using Asana and have dependencies with your engineering team, you could connect Asana as a source to Zepel and send requests.

Alternatives to Asana and Trello

Of course, there are several alternatives to Asana and Trello out there. In case you still aren’t too sure, below are X tools you might want to consider:

1. Zepel

Zepel is an ideal alternative for Trello and Asana if you’re a team building software products and are looking for more power.

Zepel supports agile methodologies (both Scrum and Kanban), has functional reports, and developer-friendly features that’d keep your team productive.

Unlike other project management tools, Zepel also lets you bring customer feedback and bug reports from other tools (Zendesk, Sentry, Intercom, and more), so you can prioritize with context and build customer-focused products painlessly.

Your first 5 members are free forever even when you add more than 5 members. Zepel pricing doesn’t restrict you on features even if you’re on the free plan. The standard plan starts at $5/member/month when paid annually and $7/member/month when paid monthly.

2. JIRA

JIRA is the industry standard. Software teams who want agile capabilities gradually switch to JIRA when other tools aren’t powerful enough for them.

However, over the last few years, this trend has been changing. Teams are frustrated with how clunky and slow the tool is. This has led most modern teams to look for a JIRA alternative.

Your first 10 members in JIRA are for free. However, there are some feature restrictions. Also, when you upgrade to the premium plan that starts at $5/member/month, JIRA pricing model forces you to pay for your first 10 members which were initially for free.

To help you decide whether to pick JIRA or not, here are some helpful comparisons of Asana vs JIRA and Trello vs JIRA.

But if you’re one of those teams who is unhappy with JIRA, you might be interested in this list of tools like JIRA.

Asana Markdown Download

3. Basecamp

Basecamp is an ideal alternative to both Trello and Asana if you’re a services company that’s remote and isn’t specific about needing views like Kanban or Gantt. It was founded in 1999.

Basecamp’s primary features include task tracking, to-do lists, a forum-like view for team messaging, file sharing, a check-in request for standups, and time tracking.

Basecamp pricing is simple. You can start a free 30-day trial and use all its features. Once the trial is up, you pay a flat fee of $99/month for an unlimited number of projects and users.

4. Notion

Asana

Notion took the industry by a storm when it launched publicly in June 2018. Notion is an all-in-one productivity tool that lets you use it as a project management tool, note-taking app, and more.

It’s simple to use and allows you to mould it in any way you want. It’s so flexible, several teams use Notion as an alternative to Trello, Asana, and even Evernote.

It's free to use. You can invite up to 5 guests. If you want more features, Notion pricing plan includes multiple paid plans that range from $4/month to $8/member/month.

5. Wrike

Wrike has been around as a project management tool for a while and is a solid tool for non-technical teams considering Trello or Asana.

Similar to Asana, it supports Kanban Boards, Gantt, time tracking, request forms, calendar views, and deep integration with Salesforce, MS Projects, Excel, Google Drive, Dropbox, and others.

Wrike has a free plan for up to 5 members and limited features. If you want more features or want to add more members, their pricing plan ranges from $9.80/member/month to $24.80/member/month.

You might be interested in the comparison of Wrike vs Asana.

Why choose Zepel over Trello or Asana?

Zepel is the simplest project management tool built for software product teams. It’s built to remove all the frustrations and eliminate inefficiencies teams have during their development process.

With capabilities to bring your customer’s exact words into the tool for easy prioritization, boards, sprints, reports, advanced filtering, and more, Zepel makes it effortless to build customer-focused software.

Zepel takes a step further to make the development process easier with features like / commands, markdown editor, hierarchical view, chrome extension, and deep integrations.

The best part, you can import your existing data from other tools in one-click and play around with Zepel for free without any strings attached.

Try Zepel for free.

Other helpful articles

Thousands of companies have been using both Asana and Jira to fulfill their PM needs. Asana offers plenty of functionalities for managing both IT and non-IT projects while Jira is widely preferred by product development squads worldwide.

Both of these project management software have their pros and cons. But which of the two apps is ideal for your org in 2021?

Let’s compare Asana vs Jira in-detail and find out. But first, let us have a quick overview of both PM apps.

Quick Overview of Asana

Asana was founded in 2008 by former Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and ex-facebook engineer Justin Rosenstein. And today, it has established itself as a team collaboration application in the PM sector. Although Asana caters to both IT and non-IT companies, it is more popular among non-IT teams like marketing, sales, etc.

Project management in Asana is task-oriented. That is, here, PM revolves around projects and tasks. So, for every project that you create, you can create work items and subtasks, assign them to squad members, add descriptions, tags, comments, and custom fields.

In essence, Asana is a feature-loaded task handling application that provides a platform for your org to communicate and collaborate.

But are these functionalities useful in managing projects for your org? Let’s learn more about Asana and find out.

Asana Markdown In Comments

The good, the bad, the ugly

Here are things about Asana that are likable, not so likable but are tolerable, and aspects you’re most certainly going to hate.

The Good:

  • Asana is very flexible and customizable with its custom templates, custom tags, and custom fields. You can tailor it to serve your needs. You can also find plenty of saved templates to get familiar with.
  • Asana supports multiple views to help visualize your projects and monitor progress. Additionally, its workload aspect allows you to view what work and how much work is assigned to whom.
  • A great deal of crowd favourite third-party apps are available at your disposal to streamline your workflows.
  • Asana’s team communication and collaboration capabilities enable you to keep all your work items and related conversations in one place.

The Bad:

  • The learning curve is pretty steep, making onboarding a difficult task. But once you spend a considerable amount of time using Asana, you will find it easy to use this application.
  • Budgeting and reporting capabilities to compute and plan your budgets are absent but you can make do without it by creating a custom field to track budgets or using 3rd-party apps with time tracking and budgeting apps like Everhour.
  • Asana doesn’t support viewing tasks and subtasks in a single, nestled view, unlike Zepel. It doesn't get in the way of any work process but it can certainly make task handling easier as it greatly minimizes the chance of missing out on a work item.

The Ugly:

  • Forget about implementing agile frameworks like scrum as it is not a scrum tool. If you require agile capabilities more than simple kanban functionalities, you have no choice but to consider alternatives to Asana that are full-fledged agile tools.
  • No provision to add multiple assignees to a task. This can get frustrating when more than one person is working collaboratively on a single task.
  • The pricing plan isn’t affordable and quite frankly, you end up paying too many dollars for very little benefits. You can only collaborate with 15 members in its free plan and that too with basic functionalities only. You won’t find such functionality restrictions in Zepel, even in its free plan.

Quick Overview of Jira

Jira is a product of the company called Atlassian and was founded in 2002. Initially, the whole purpose of this app was to be an issue and bug tracking application.

But today, Jira has grown into a project management tool for agile product development. So, it targets app developers, engineers, and project managers who are on the lookout for PM apps to help build applications.

Since this app is difficult to get a hang of for beginners who are new to project management tools, companies get started with Atlassian’s Trello. And on comparing Trello vs Jira, they move to Jira for more functionality.

Jira is extremely popular among IT firms, big and small, looking to adopt agile for building products. But does that make it perfect for your org? Read on to find out.

The good, the bad, the ugly

Atlassian’s Jira, just like any other PM app, has its pluses, pain points that you can live with, and intolerable minuses.

The Good:

  • Jira is your go-to application for tracking issues and bugs in your product. After all, it is Jira’s USP. You can capture these issues and bugs, assign them to members, prioritize and track them to completion.
  • Being very flexible, Jira enables you to customize your workflow using its workflow builder. With this builder, you can now set up rules to define how a task/card should move from one status to another.
  • A massive library of third-party apps for use cases of CRM, code review, and more.

The Bad:

  • Agile capabilities for building products may be Jira’s strong suit but it still lacks finesse when it comes to assisting development squads in implementing frameworks like scrum as its competitors such as Zepel do. You won’t find here the elegant Sprints view that has built-in agile reports such as burnup and burndown charts.
  • Even though you can set up some advanced configurations to restrict the visibility of certain work items in certain kanban columns to certain people, this can lead to miscommunication and lost productivity within your squad if not done right.
  • Unlike Asana, you can track resources and plan for budgeting but for the monetary aspects of budgeting, you need to use 3rd-party apps like Tempo.
  • The roadmap functionality to track the overall progress of the entire project is nice but it lacks facilities to gain some oversight.
  • Jira has an external customer service desk to collect bugs and support requests from customers but unlike Zepel’s Streams, it does not bring in customer requests from various customer feedback platforms such as Canny, Intercom, etc.

The Ugly:

  • Jira’s design may seem extremely streamlined from the outside but can result in your agile squad getting micromanaged when you dive in. That’s why most developers hate this app, apart from its slow speed. And they prefer alternatives to Jira such as Zepel, which is extremely developer-friendly.
  • The primary unit of work here, unlike Asana, is an issue and not a task. This is a terrible place to begin building products as you will think in terms of tickets and not features.
  • Creating workflows is hellish due to its complex design.
  • The pricing plan limits onboarding to only 10 members in Jira’s free plan and it comes with certain functionality restrictions, unlike Zepel that has absolutely no restrictions on functionalities.

Comprehensive comparison of Asana vs Jira

AsanaJira
Views & FeaturesAsana is packed with utilities from
traditional task handling to squad
collaboration and CRM. But it lacks
agile capabilities other than a
simple kanban board.
Multiple views namely board, gantt,
calendar, and so on.
Jira offers quite a lot of functionalities
but not nearly as many as Asana
does. Its key highlights include issue
and bug tracking functionalities,
roadmaps, and agile capabilities such
as scrum boards, kanbanboards,
agile reports, etc.
Has a number of views such as list,
board,and issue detail view.
Ease of use & UXIntuitive UI that is simple and user
friendly but owing to the ton of
functionalities Asana offers, the
learning curve is steep.
Easy to set up and use but the user
experience isn’t all that good due
to the complexity in its design.
Developer-friendlinessAsana lacks powerful agile
capabilities and deep integrations
with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.
Also, it lacks markdown support,
which makes it hard for devs to
share code snippets with each
other. So, it isn’t very developer
friendly.
Jira enables quite deep integrations
with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket
but it is extremely slow. Also, its over-
engineered workflows cause
micromanagement. Thus, most
developers tend to hate Jira.
Collaboration & team
management
Onboarding members is not that
easy due to its steep learning curve.
Team communication and
collaboration is made efficient with
the conversations utility that holds
all squad-related conversations in
one place.
The extremely steep learning curve
due to its complex design makes
onboarding a mammoth task.
In terms of squad handling, this app
offers many functionalities from
messaging and file sharing to
collaborative problem-solving.
Integrations & add-onsOver 160 well-known 3rd-party apps
from Slack to Salesforce.
Whopping 2000+ third-party apps
and add-ons are available.
PricingAsana’s free plan allows you to
collaborate up to 15 users with
functionality restrictions. The paid
plans start at $12.50/person.
Jira allows you to add up to 10
members in its free plan, with limited
functionalities. The paid plans start at
$7/user.
Pros- Intuitive UI
- Custom templates, tags, and fields
- Several in-built views and quick
filters
- Workload functionality shows an
overview of how much work each
member is assigned
- Conversations functionality helps
hold squad-related conversations in
one place
- Powerful agile capabilities
- Efficient issue and bug tracking
- Massive library of third-party apps
and add-ons
- Customizable workflows
- Roadmap functionality
Cons- Steep learning curve
- Lacks agile capabilities other than
kanban
- Can’t add multiple assignees to an
item
- No nestled view to view tasks and
subtasks
- Costly
- Being an issue and bug tracker,
Jira’s approach to PM is flawed
- Extremely steep learning curve
- Clunky and slow application
- Boring UI with complex design
- Setting up workflows is a nightmare
- Expensive
Best forNon-IT squads such as marketing,
sales, customer success, and so
on.
Application development companies
that prefer managing projects the
agile way.

3 Reasons to consider alternatives to Asana and Jira

1. Getting started is a nightmare

When you’re looking to get started or onboard your squad, brace yourself for the steep learning curve ahead. Both the apps offer a ton of utilities and add-ons that can be pretty confusing for a newbie to get started with.

2. Too many features and add-ons but of very little use

Asana is loaded with functionalities but lacks agile capabilities other than simple kanban board, which makes it a bit disappointing considering the price you pay for this app. On the other hand, in a pursuit to be an all-in-one suite for application development companies, Jira also offers plenty of aspects including agile functionalities for scrum and kanban. But it fails to deliver any of these aspects satisfactorily.

3. Pricing is heavy on the pocket

Both Asana and Jira will definitely leave a dent in your wallet, despite offering a free plan. You can add up to 15 members in Asana’s free plan while you can only add a maximum of 10 users in Jira. But since the two apps have restrictions on functionalities, you must choose an appropriate paid plan. Asana’s paid plan starts at 12.50/member/month while Jira’s paid plan starts at $7/user/month.

4 Alternatives to Asana and Jira

1. Zepel

Zepel is an ideal alternative to both as it is the perfect blend of the two apps but with more benefits. It is intuitive like Asana with powerful agile capabilities like Jira. Thus, you get the best of both worlds.

Painlessly onboard your squads owing to Zepel’s uncomplicated design. And efficiently implement popular agile frameworks that you prefer, such as scrum, kanban, or both.

Unlike its counterparts, Zepel is by far one of the most developer-friendly apps as it supports deep integrations with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and other similar sources. Zepel goes a step further and enables you to set up and automate your git workflows to perform status updates on your dev crew’s behalf. Complete this workflow by connecting your Slack to it and receive real-time notifications of progress updates by your squad. Some other sweet developer-friendly perks of Zepel are the markdown support and / commands that help get work done in a jiffy.

And to top it off, Zepel has a functionality called Streams that brings in customer feedback in the form of requests from various external sources such as Canny, Intercom, Zendesk, etc.

Thus, with Zepel, you can prioritize and build customer-focussed features for your product.

Key Highlights:

  • Intuitive yet powerful UI that eases onboarding
  • Agile capabilities like Sprints, burndown charts, etc that allow both Scrum and Kanban implementation
  • Developer-friendly due to deep integration with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and a variety of similar sources
  • Workflow automation to perform status updates and receive instant Slack notifications
  • Brings in customer feedback from multiple sources like Canny, Intercom, etc., and helps prioritize it
  • Great pricing plan!

Have a look at all the functionalities that Zepel offers here.

Pricing:

Zepel’s pricing plan consists of a free plan that doesn’t charge a penny for the first 5 members forever no matter how many members you add. When you add your 6th member, the standard annual plan starts at $5/member/month and its standard monthly plan starts at $7/member.

Best For:

Squads of any size that desire to build exceptional software products.

Zepel vs Asana vs Jira

Asana Markdown Table

2. Basecamp

Basecamp is a solid tool for project management and is ideal for managing tasks. What makes Basecamp a great alternative to consider is how it effectively brings all members of different squads together. However, Basecamp lacks agile capabilities.

Key Highlights:

  • Messaging platform with a forum-like view for team communication
  • Automatic check-ins for frequent status updates
  • Controlled client access
  • Hill charts to track progress
  • File sharing with a storage of 500GB

Here’s everything that Basecamp offers.

Pricing:

Basecamp offers a simple plan with a 30-day free trial. At the end of the trial, you will need to pay a flat fee of $99/month for unlimited users.

Best For:

Remote, service-based companies that don’t require agile methodologies.

3. Wrike

Wrike is a Jira counterpart that targets agile product development orgs. Akin to Jira, Wrike also lacks an intuitive user interface and has a very steep learning curve.

Key Highlights:

  • Customizable workspaces
  • Easy to share, insightful, visual and dynamic reports
  • Boards, Gantt, and Calendar view to track progress and plan deadlines
  • Workload and resource administration
  • Shareable task lists and dashboards

Check out all the functionalities Wrike offers.

Pricing:

Wrike is free for up to 5 members. The paid plans start at $9.80/member/month.

Best For:

Agile product development and non-IT companies that are small in size.

Compare Wrike vs Asana to see which tool is a better bet.

4. Monday.com

Monday.com is a PM app that is very similar to Asana. This app is also loaded with utilities but lacks agile capabilities. Because of far too many functionalities, it is easy to lose focus and difficult to get started.

Read about the in-depth comparisons of Asana vs Monday and Asana vs Trello vs Monday.

Key Highlights:

  • More than sufficient functionalities and multiple views, namely, calendar, gantt, forms, and so on
  • Customizable notifications and reports
  • Ability to automate certain tasks
  • Plenty of templates for almost every type of PM squad
  • Several integrations with 3rd party apps like Slack, Asana, Trello, Toggl, Google Calendar, and more

View all the attributes that monday.com provides here.

Pricing:

Monday.com’s pricing plan is complex and doesn’t have a free plan. It offers a 14-day trial post which you must choose a paid plan that starts at $10/member/month.

Best For:

Non-technical IT squads such as marketing, sales, etc.

5 reasons to pick Zepel over the others

Zepel is the PM app meant for your squad and your organization for the following 5 reasons:

Asana Markdown 2019

1. Collaborate with squads of any size

Zepel enables you to onboard and collaborate with product development squads of any size with ease.

2. Implement Scrum, Kanban, or both

Zepel offers powerful agile capabilities that help you implement widely-used agile frameworks such as scrum, kanban, or a combination of both. So, if you think agile, think Zepel. ;)

3. Not too many features, not too less

Zepel does not offer too many functionalities as that can be distracting and overwhelming. At the same time, it doesn’t lack any key utilities that you’d require to streamline your workflows. This way you can build products without chaos and distraction.

Asana Markdown Plugin

4. Keeps both your customers and your squad happy

Zepel Streams helps build customer-focussed functionalities that are sure to satisfy your customers. And the deep integration with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket is everything your developers need.

5. Absolutely affordable pricing

Zepel’s straightforward pricing plan includes a free plan and a paid plan. The free forever plan enables you to add up to 5 members for free, forever (literally!), without any functionality restrictions. Even if your squad expands and you must add a 6th member, you won’t be charged for the first 5 members. The paid plan starts at $5/member.

These 5 reasons should have helped you realize that Zepel's the right tool for your organization.

But if you're still on the fence, sign up and try Zepel for free. You will swear by it, just like the 4000+ development teams using Zepel.

Other helpful articles